For the head of the US hunt, the added value of the 5th Generation is far from obvious

With more than 6000 hours recorded on his logbook On F-15C, F-15E, F-16, F-35A and even F / A-18 during his passage in Australia, General Mark D. Kelly, who commands the US Air Force Fighter, is what we commonly call in this environment, “a mustachioed”. In fact, when he gives his opinion about the performance of the F-15EX after taking control of the aircraft, it is relevant to pay attention to what he has to say. A fervent supporter of the new Boeing fighter within the US Air Force, even when it was more than reluctant to this arrival, the officer was full of praise for the aircraft, especially that he spent most of his pilot career flying his big brothers, the F-15C for air superiority, and the F-15E Strike Eagle for strike missions.

Being one of the rare pilots to have flown the F-35A and the F-15EX and to be qualified on both fighters, he was naturally questioned about the differences between the two aircraft which, according to one of the journalists present, do not belong to the same generation. “What exactly are we talking about?” Stealth, sensors and data fusion, weaponry, avionics? » the general asked the journalist, “because there is no doubt that a 4th generation aircraft which will have received (like the F-15EX) the sensors, avionics and weapons of the 5th generation, will bring a very great operational added value against its adversaries. And to remember thatThe F-15EX was part of the 4+1 aircraft models, with the F-35A, the replacement for the F-22 from the NGAD program, the F-16 (and its potential replacement also from the NGAD program) and the A-10, which will constitute the US Air Force's fighter fleet in 2030.

NGAD Screeenshot News Defense | Military alliances | Fighter jets
To face the rise of Chinese power, the US Air Force knows that it must quickly acquire new operational capabilities

In fact, the very definition of 5th generation aircraft is imprecise to say the least. Initially, this was a classification designating the F-22 and its innovative capabilities, namely multi-aspect stealth, super-cruise or the ability to maintain supersonic flight without resorting to afterburner, hyper-maneuverability and advanced sensing and data fusion capabilities. But with the arrival of the F-35, which could not be other than the archetype of the 5th generation, it was necessary to change this definition, since if the device was certainly stealthy, but not in a multi-aspect way, it was not was neither super-maneuvering, quite the contrary, nor equipped with super-cruise, even struggling to maintain supersonic flight at full afterburner in level without rapidly deteriorating its anti-radar coating. From then on, the 5th generation became a sort of abstract concept in which only recently designed devices, equipped with a minimum of stealth, and modern sensors entered. This is how the Su-57 and the J-20 appeared, also designated 5th generation, because they more or less meet these criteria. However, for many, the simple designation of 5th generation device was enough to demonstrate the absolute superiority of it over older devices.

There are 75% of this article left to read, Subscribe to access it!

Metadefense Logo 93x93 2 Defense News | Military alliances | Fighter aircraft

The Classic subscriptions provide access to
articles in their full version, and without advertising,
from 1,99 €.

For further


Comments are closed.


Last articles