With a defense budget of €7,8 billion per year, or 2% of the country's GDP, Romania is one of NATO's good students, even if this effort is handicapped by a GDP of less than $300 billion and one of the lowest per capita GDPs in the European Union. There increased defense effort, started in 2013 after Vladimir's return to the Kremlin and the significant hardening of the Russian posture in Eastern Europe, made it possible to increase the defense effort from 1,2% of GDP to 2% today, and of aim for 2,5% in the coming years, while the country can rely on dynamic growth of around 5% per year. The increase in budgets enabled Bucharest to launch several arms acquisition programs, both to modernize its armed forces and to westernize its equipment, which until now was largely made up of Soviet materials produced under license by local industry. Thus, in 2020, the Romanian air and ground forces began to receive the first of 7 MIM-104 Patriot anti-aircraft batteries ordered from the United States, while in 2016, the first of 17 F-16 used cars acquired from Portugal, followed this year by 32 other F-16s ceded by Norway. In 2019, the French Naval Group won the competition for the construction of 4 Gowind 2500 corvettes, while Bucharest has since started discussions with Paris for the acquisition of Scorpene submarines.
A few days ago, the Romanian Ministry of Defense presented its plan to modernize its land forces, this after announcing, a few weeks ago, the acquisition of 54 second-hand M1 Abrams heavy tanks from the United States. And the least we can say is that Bucharest is giving itself the means to achieve its ambitions, by putting no less than €10 billion on the table to acquire 298 infantry fighting vehicles, 41 SHORAD short-range anti-aircraft protection systems, around 155 485 mm self-propelled artillery systems, as well as 120 AIM-9 and AIM-16X Sidewinder air-to-air missiles for arming its recently acquired F-XNUMXs, all with an ambitious delivery schedule.
The 298 infantry combat vehicles, for which €3 billion have been provisioned, including €2,5 billion for a first order of 246 armored vehicles, the delivery of which should begin this year, will have to replace some 150 MLI-84 derived from the BMP- 1 Soviet, in service since the mid-80s. They will evolve alongside the 227 Piranha V being delivered, while 150 additional copies could be ordered soon. Several VCIs meet the Bucharest specifications, and within the announced envelope, including the CV90 Mk4 which recently won the Slovak and Czech competitions, as well as the Rheinmetall KF41 Lynx selected by Budapest in 2020. However, the big favourite, today today is none other than the South Korean K21, after the state corporation ROMARM signed, at the beginning of February, a Memorandum of Understanding for the production of armored vehicles with the South Korean Hanwha, following the example of what was done in Poland regarding the K2 tanks and the K9 self-propelled guns. Economical with a public unit price of less than $5 million, powerfully armed with a 40mm auto cannon, and very mobile thanks to its 750 hp engine giving it a power/weight ratio of 29 hp per ton, the K21 has indeed arguments to put forward, especially accompanied by an effective industrial agreement, especially since the planned budget envelope (€10m/armoured vehicle) offers great freedom of configuration to Romanian negotiators.
The rest of this article is for subscribers only
The Classic subscriptions provide access to
all articles without advertising, starting at € 1,99.
Newsletter subscription
Register for the Meta-Defense Newsletter to receive the
latest fashion articles daily or weekly
We always come across the same problem as with Poland.
The European military industry is in sampling for lack of orders and when your neighbor is called Vlad you are not so patient about deliveries.
Result, you buy available OCCAZ (I loved your article on leasing in the French armies) or from an industrial company with a large production capacity.
With these criteria there remain the American stocks and the Korean chains.
Because Vlad, they're really scared of it.
QED
There is also a real price problem. The K9 costs twice as much as a Psh2000, while it offers, with very few things, the performance. It is likely that the similar configuration price difference is also significant for the K21 and the Lf41/CV90.
Even the Caesar is in trouble, as its unit price is close to that of the K9, while the latter is tracked, armored and self-loading. Despite the undeniable arguments of the French system, there are a lot of arguments to counter against the K9
After I have little information on the rendering on the battlefield of a K9
Have you got some ?
[…] […]
It becomes necessary to facilitate the acquisition of our equipment, as much in price, availability and means of payment! Even if it means being more politically aggressive...
[…] an influx of means allows the staffs to undertake vast programs of modernization of the forces, in particular to carry out the transition of equipment dating from the Soviet era, towards […]