Rather than developing a new battle tank, the US Army announced a few weeks ago that it was moving towards a radical evolution of its M1 Abrams, to give birth to the M1E3 Abrams by the end of the decade.
Like Germany and its Leopard 2AX, for the United States, it is a question of responding as best as possible, in the face of time and technological constraints, to the lessons of the war in Ukraine, and in particular to the massive arrival of drones at all levels of combat.
In this section:
This approach, which is opposed to the objectives of an MGCS program, is intended to be pragmatic to respond to the operational, but also commercial, challenges that arise today.
In this context, France, on the basis of a radical evolution of the Leclerc tank based on the EMBT turret, must also invite itself into this race against the clock which has started on both sides from the Atlantic?
The robotic transformation of the battlefield is underway
If there is one crucial lesson to be learned from the 19 months of war in Ukraine, it is undoubtedly the now central role that robotic technologies, more particularly drones, have taken on the battlefield.
These intervene in almost all spaces of conflict, whether it involves striking units on the front line, directing long and very long range artillery fire, carrying out air raids or naval forces against the enemy's rear bases, and even to carry out campaigns of terror against civilian populations.
The arrival of these drones and other lurking munitions now influences the operational thinking of military strategists, to the point of shaping, with other often related factors, the very design of new military equipment.
This is how Loyal Wingmen and other Remote Carriers are today at the heart of the design of new generation combat aircraft such as the NGAD in the United States, the British GCAP (Italy/Japan), and the European SCAF.
They also influence the design of new military ships, whether surface combatant units such as destroyers and frigates, large naval and assault ships, mine warfare vessels and even submarines.
This is also the case in the field of land armaments, whether artillery, combat and support armored vehicles, and now the lord of the battlefield, the battle tank.
There are 75% of this article left to read, Subscribe to access it!
The Classic subscriptions provide access to
articles in their full version, and without advertising,
from €1,99. Subscriptions Premium also allow access to archives (articles over two years old)
Christmas promotion : 15% discount on Premium and Classic subscriptions annual with the code MetaXmas2024, from 11/12 to 27/12 only.
In any case, the Germans play their own strengths (and that's normal) we should stop this Macron utopia, collaborate occasionally with others, but above all strengthen our BITD and our own technologies in all areas (military and civil)
[…] France, on the basis of a radical evolution of the Leclerc tank based on the EMBT turret, must it also invite itself into the race against the clock which has started on both sides of Atlantic ? […]
Do as for Rafale, build an evolving tank with a view to longer-term use and taking into account future developments over time. Maintain skills in our industries and skills and training in the armies